Advocata Institute congratulates President Anura Kumara Dissanayake

Originally appeared in the Daily FT

The Advocata Institute has extended its heartfelt congratulations to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake on his election as the ninth Executive President of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka.

In a message addressed to the President, Advocata Institute Chairman Murtaza Jafferjee and CEO Dhananath Fernando acknowledged the trust and confidence placed in President Dissanayake by the people of Sri Lanka.

They expressed optimism that his leadership will guide the country towards a more prosperous and equitable future.

“As an independent policy think tank committed to advancing economic freedoms and improving the well-being of Sri Lankans through economic prosperity, we believe your tenure offers a unique opportunity to pursue meaningful reforms that will continue economic stability, promote sustainable growth, enhance governance, and uplift the living standards of all citizens,” Jafferjee said.

The Advocata Institute also emphasised its readiness to support the new administration with its expertise in economic research and public policy, highlighting the power of evidence-based policymaking in driving positive change.

“We look forward to collaborating with your Government on initiatives that foster an open and thriving economy,” said Fernando, expressing the organisation’s commitment to the principles of economic freedom and innovation as drivers of national prosperity.

Press Release: Advocata Institute Applauds Economic Transformation Bill, Calls for Careful Implementation and Transparency

Originally appeared on Daily FT, Ada Derana

The Advocata Institute welcomes the government’s stated intention to move from an inward-oriented economy to a more open economy to boost international trade, foreign investment and productivity.

The Sri Lankan government has gazetted the Economic Transformation Bill to overhaul the country's economic landscape. This ambitious Bill aims to create a more competitive, export-oriented, and digitally-driven economy while achieving net-zero emissions by 2050- however, enshrining economic targets in law may prove to be problematic.

Some of the key reforms include the establishment of new institutions that are intended to address some important issues. The Bill proposes establishing an Economic Commission to streamline economic activity and trade, and splitting the role of the Board of Investments (BOI) between Zones SL, Invest Sri Lanka, and the Economic Commission. Additionally, the bill also sets up specialized bodies to focus on promoting foreign investment (Invest Sri Lanka), developing industrial zones (Zones SL) and international trade (Office for International Trade), boosting productivity (National Productivity Commission), and providing economic expertise (Sri Lanka Institute of Economics and International Trade).

The policy will address crucial areas like debt management, agricultural modernisation, import-export regulations, and economic governance.

The Economic Transformation Bill sets ambitious debt reduction targets, aiming to bring the public debt-to-GDP ratio below 95% by 2032 and significantly reduce annual government borrowing needs. This strategy is complemented by a Public Financial Management Bill, which will be introduced alongside the Economic Transformation Act, to ensure responsible management of public finances and prevent future economic crises.

The Bill requires the Cabinet of Ministers to submit a report to Parliament every five years, outlining the policy framework and strategies to achieve the National Economic Transformation goals (Section 5). This may be revised from time to time and presented to Parliament. The first report is to be presented in 2025.

All policies, programmes, regulations, circulars, and directives of the Government shall conform to such National Policy on Economic Transformation. The government will also present a report each year on March 31st detailing progress made towards each target, and any corrective actions taken as and when needed (Section 7).

Limits for levels of debt and public expenditure are within the control of the government and are widely used in other countries. Targets such as Exports/GDP, FDI/GDP while clearly signaling the government's intent, belong more to the realm of policy than law. The bill makes provisions that where these targets have not been met, the Government shall inform Parliament of the measures being taken to remedy the situation and indicate when they will be met. While the remedial measures reflect a commitment to meeting these targets, the practicality of it may be questionable as many factors influencing these targets often extend beyond direct government control.

Key Aspects of Concern

• The composition of the Board of the Economic Commission, which proposes a ten member board with four ex officio members of the relevant line ministries while there will be six members appointed by the President. The chairperson of the Economic Commission Board will also be a Presidential appointment, while the Director General of the Economic Commission is a Ministerial appointment. The wide powers exercised by the President over these appointments leave room for questions of credibility and politicization of appointments which needs to be carefully considered. Independent appointments of these key officials is mandatory for effective national policy formulation.

• Advocata is concerned that certain provisions of the Bill do not apply to the Colombo Port City Special Economic Zone, established under section 2 of the Colombo Port City Economic Commission Act, No. 11 of 2021. This exclusion could lead to unfair competition.

• Another important point of concern is the incentives and exemptions offered to investors under this bill, which leaves room for ad-hoc short-term measures that can be changed from time to time under the prescription of the Minister.

• Setting targets on debt and primary balance is commonly found in laws, while targets for GDP growth, exports, and unemployment are often addressed as policy targets. By codifying these targets into law, they gain a degree of enforceability that is not typical for policy goals. This raises questions about the mechanisms for enforcement and the consequences for failing to meet these targets. The decision to legislate specific economic targets in Sri Lanka’s Economic Transformation Act is unusual but comes with potential challenges in terms of enforcement and practicality.

Year on Year increase in food prices of 2%

Originally appeared in the Daily Mirror, Daily FT, The Morning

Advocata’s Bath Curry Indicator (BCI) which is a price-index that tracks the monthly changes in the retail price of a basket of commonly consumed food items recorded a year-on-year increase of roughly 2% between September 2022 and September 2023 and a month-on-month fall of 1.6% in between August and September 2023. Additionally, the BCI also tracks the price of the same basket of food items as they retail at local supermarkets, which shows an annual decline of roughly 16% of the BCI’s basket of items between September 2022 to 2023, and month-on-month fall of 3.2% between August and September 2023.

The graph below visualizes the fluctuations in the BCI and BCI-Supermarket indices over the last 3 years.

According to the BCI, the items that contributed the most to prices falling between August 2023 to September 2023 were tomatoes (12%), pumpkin (10%) and brinjals (8%). Alternatively the prices of green chillies (7%) and beans (4%) increased during this period. The Advocata BCI tracks the weekly retail prices in the Colombo market of the most commonly consumed food ingredients that might be used in a typical bath curry meal. The prices are collected from the “Weekly Indicators” that the Central Bank publishes. 

The BCI Indicator can be accessed at www.bci.advocata.org

Year on Year food price increase close to 50%

Originally appeared in the Ceylon Today, Lanka Business Online, Daily FT

Advocata’s  Bath Curry Indicator (BCI) , which tracks the monthly changes in the retail price of food, recorded an increase of 14% from March 2022 to April 2022.  This is a year on year increase of 49% for this basket of food. 

This is driven primarily by prices of dhal and samba rice being the highest recorded by the BCI. A kilo of Dhal in April 2021 was Rs 178, a year later it costs Rs 466. A kilo of samba in April 2021 was close to Rs 130, a year later this costs Rs 210. With food prices increasing at this rate, a family of four to spend on the BCI basket of food would have to pay approximately Rs 560 more for a week. 

The Colombo consumer price index recorded a similar rate of 47% year on year increase in food inflation. Comparing supermarket food prices from March 2021 to 2022 there has been an increase of close to 40%. 

This drastic increase in food prices in 2022 is a result of macroeconomic instability within the country. Although global prices have increased due to the pandemic and issues with supply chains, global prices have not  increased as fast as the prices in Sri Lanka. 

In Sri Lanka in addition to the global pandemic related issues, we are currently facing shortages of foreign currency which impacts local supply chains.  This impact has also been exacerbated by consistent import restrictions, both causing shortages. These shortages compounded by the fact that the value of the currency has been falling steeply have all contributed to food prices rising faster and faster in 2022. 

The BCI tracks the weekly retail prices in the Colombo market of the most commonly consumed food ingredients that might be used in a typical Buth curry meal. The prices are collected from the “Weekly Indicators” that the Central Bank publishes. 

The BCI Indicator can be accessed at www.bci.advocata.org.

15% food price increase in a single month

Originally appeared in the Daily FT

Advocata’s  Bath Curry Indicator (BCI) , which tracks the monthly changes in the retail price of food, recorded an increase of 15% from November 2021 to December 2021. 

Much of this increase is driven by rising prices of vegetables. 100g of Green Chillies at Rs18 increased to Rs 71. This is a 287% increase in just one month. Similarly, prices of Brinjals have increased by 51%, red onions by 40% and beans and tomatoes by 10%. 

Overall, since 2019, prices have almost doubled, and compared to December 2020, prices have increased by 37%. 

This means that an average family of four, who spent  Rs. 1165  weekly on the BCI basket of food items in December 2020 now has to pay Rs 1593 for the same basket of goods just 1 year later. 

The BCI tracks the weekly retail prices in the Colombo market of the most commonly consumed food ingredients that might be used in a typical Buth curry meal. The prices are collected from the “Weekly Indicators” that the Central Bank publishes. 

  The BCI Indicator can be accessed at www.bci.advocata.org.

Fostering competition and improving productivity are the best form of price control.

Originally appeared in the Daily FT , Daily Mirror

The crucial role of prices in solving the economic problem.

The recent  decision by the government to withdraw several gazette notifications imposing price controls is a step in the right direction.  Consecutive governments have used  price controls  to address equity concerns instead of undertaking the hard reforms needed to create competitive markets.  Prices are central to solving the core economic problem that all societies face: how are scarce resources (re)allocated to meet as many of the unlimited wants of consumers as possible? Allowing prices to carry out this function, so that more consumer wants can be met achieves the best outcome for an economy.  

From such a perspective, the recent decision to end price controls on essential foods (including milk powder and wheat flour) , liquid petroleum gas and cement is  a step in the right direction. Price controls create distortions such as shortages, rationing and the creation of a black market as well as substitution towards low quality alternatives. Although price controls are often introduced by governments with the intention of protecting the poorest consumers in society,  they are  very inefficient, as a means of redistribution. Often these subsidies are biased against the poor as they consume less of these goods than the rich.  Further, sharp increases in prices could have negative consequences on low income households in the short run.  Ideally such price increases should be made gradually so consumers can adjust to them or be able to shift to cheaper alternatives.  

Administratively controlled prices particularly on goods and services provided by the government exert a huge burden on the fiscal, leading to high borrowings and debt.  It also affects the conduct of monetary policy by masking  underlying inflationary pressures. 

Fostering competition and boosting productivity is a better way of reducing the cost of living. This involves removing barriers to entry and deregulating the economy. A good example of this is in the cement industry. The industry is dominated by two players and competition is constrained by a government policy that restricts the number of plants that can operate in each port.  If a new factory is set up,  priority is given to existing operators in the port. This limits new investment and  competitive pricing. Another key issue that makes construction prohibitively expensive is the use of paratariffs (CESS) on imports reducing contestability in the market. There is a misplaced perception that imports are not necessary, where there is local production, but it is the threat of imports that increases contestability, keeps prices low and improves consumer surplus. Further, it also incentivises domestic producers to improve productivity and competitiveness benefiting all stakeholders. 

The same is true of the LP gas industry. There are only two players in the market, i.e., the state-run Litro Lanka Limited and Laugfs Gas PLC.  One would expect that the presence of  Laughs Gas should create some competition in the industry.  However, strict governmental control  over LP gas prices and barriers to entry for new players into the industry, have prevented an efficient market  from developing.  The industry is highly capital intensive and the lack of storage facilities is the most significant  entry barrier.  Allowing  the use of common storage facilities along with opportunities in distribution will make the industry more competitive, exerting  a downward pressure on prices in the long run.  

Our experience over the past few months illustrate the adverse impact of price controls on the economy.  At the same time, governments are also  concerned that removing price controls would generate inflationary pressures. However, through careful management and communication, one - off increases in prices need not feed into inflation expectations and wage negotiations.  This requires tight rein over demand driven inflation and credibility that the central bank would use its monetary policy tools to keep inflation within its targeted range of 4 - 6 per cent. 

Hence, going forward, we urge the government to refrain from using price controls to address equity concerns. Instead, creating a competitive business environment and boosting supply is the best solution to lower prices in the economy. In order to support vulnerable households the government should provide a cash transfer to cushion the impact of price increases of essential commodities. This would require a re-examination of the Samurdhi scheme which currently excludes some of the most vulnerable households and tighter administration to ensure benefits accrue to those who need it most. 

Advocata’s Analysis on Price Controls can be found at; https://www.research.advocata.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Price-Controls-in-Srilanka-Book.pdf. 

Key Points 

• Recalling gazettes imposing price controls is a move in the right direction. 

• Allowing market focus to set market prices prevents price instability. 

• Allowing more competition and the entry of private sector players is the only  policy solution to counter the adverse effects of unsustainable increases in market prices.   

Sri Lankan Economic Crisis: Experts vs Central Bank

Covered by The Week.

There is an argument to be made for a direct link between the decline in the island country’s foreign exchange reserves and the empty aisles in shops—the ban on the import of chemical fertilisers. It was reportedly part of Sri Lanka’s effort to be more judicious with its forex reserves. Going forward, the ban is expected to cause serious problems for Sri Lanka’s tea industry. Plantation owners fear their crop could fail as early as October, without chemical fertilisers. This would have a severe economic impact on the three million labourers who pick leaves. In fact, central Sri Lanka—Kandy and the hilly country—rely completely on income from tea and rubber.

While the shortage of food and other essentials is more easily noticeable, experts said there are other signs of trouble, too. The central bank had recently put restrictions on banks, preventing them from declaring profits until accounts had been audited. Economists assert that this is indicative of a looming banking crisis.

K.D.D.B. Vimanga, policy analyst at the Advocata Institute, a think-tank based in Colombo, said: “If reforms are brought in immediately at the macroeconomic level, the crisis will not worsen. It is high time we reform or perish.” He told THE WEEK that the economic crisis was caused by two factors—persistent fiscal deficit and external current account deficit.

Sri Lanka’s new finance minister, Basil Rajapaksa, had, on September 8, addressed the “severe foreign exchange crisis”. He informed parliament: “The data from the central bank shows the country’s net foreign exchange reserves are close to zero.” He added that the government’s revenue had fallen “between 1,500 and 1,600 billion rupees” from the estimate, because of Covid-19. “We are facing a severe external crisis as well as a domestic crisis with revenues falling and expenses continuing to rise,” he said.

Read more…

Year on year increase in food prices of 30%

Originally appeared in the Daily FT

Advocata’s Bath Curry Indicator (BCI) which tracks the monthly changes in the price of a basket of commonly consumed food items recorded a 30% increase between August 2020 and August 2021. Prices have soared due to a multitude of factors in the last few years. Prices of the same basket of food items tracked on the BCI is up 70% compared to August 2019.

This means that an average family, who spent  Rs.757 weekly on the BCI basket of food items in August 2019 now has to pay Rs 1,288 for the same basket of goods. This is roughly Rs. 500 more than in 2019.  

The month of August however recorded a minor decrease in food prices compared to the previous month, with the prices falling by 1.57% driven by lower prices for onions, rice and green chillies, whilst vegetables such as beans and pumpkin increased.

The items that contributed the most to prices falling in the month of August 2021 were Green chilli (21%), Red onions (19%) and samba rice (8%). 

Alternatively the prices of beans (6.92%), pumpkin (12.46%), brinjals (8.83%) and Dhal (0.71%) increased. 

The BCI tracks the weekly retail prices in the Colombo market of the most commonly consumed food ingredients that might be used in a typical Buth curry meal. The prices are collected from the “Weekly Indicators” that the Central Bank publishes. 

  The BCI Indicator can be accessed at www.bci.advocata.org.

Top economists: Sri Lankan import restrictions at odds with WTO rules, hurts welfare of Sri Lankans

Originally appeared in the Daily FT, Ceylon Today, Ada derana Business

The Advocata Institute DeepDive Series on “ The Role of Trade in Sri Lanka’s Economic Recovery”

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka— A panel of eminent economists urged that the Government take credible and decisive action to carry out immediate trade reforms. Advocata’s Academic Chair Dr. Sarath Rajapatirana, emphasised that “Countries that have grown very fast, especially in east asia have understood the importance of trade reform”. Further adding that the first step of such a reform agenda should be to simplify the taxes at the border by removing the so-called ‘para tariffs’ that Sri lanka levies beyond the regular import duties and to introduce a single uniform tariff for all imports. 

Sri Lanka’s trade as a % of GDP has been low when compared to neighbouring countries like Thailand and Vietnam, indicating that we have not truly exploited our opportunity to trade. Research shows, Sri Lanka, has high tariff rates compared to other developing countries, and while tariffs play a role in protecting domestic infant industries, if tariffs are too high, they can become anticompetitive. Recent import restrictions, such as banning a  wide range of consumer goods since the beginning of April 2020,  have further worsened Sri Lanka’s growth potential and put Sri Lanka at odds with WTO rules. 

Dr. Dayaratna Silva ( International Trade Economist, Former Sri Lankan Ambassador to the World Trade Organization)  elaborated on the severe consequences for Sri Lanka’s economy if such import restrictions continue. He explained that there is a possibility of tariff retaliation. “Prolonged import controls are not consistent with the WTO, and its high time such is readdressed”, he went on to say. 

Such forms of retaliation could have a significant negative effect on our imports, thereby worsening our existing foreign exchange and balance of payment crisis. Another key long term concern for the economy. “My worry is the long term industrial development of the country because of these restrictions. Resources are inefficiently being allocated as a result”, further commented Dr. Dayartna De Silva. 

His Excellency  Denis Chaibi ( Ambassador, Delegation of the European Union to Sri Lanka and the Maldives) commented on the importance of adhering to global rules on trade. He commented that “the European Union tries to have a rule based order. When a country does not follow those rules, the rule based structure is affected. Without trade, for a small country like Sri Lanka, the prospect is not good”.  His comments brought into perspective the wider ramifications of import restrictions on Sri Lanka’s multilateral relations.  

 Professor Prema- Chandra Athukorala (Emeritus Professor of Economics, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, ANU), who is an authority on global production networks, explained that “No country in the world now produces goods from the beginning to end within their geographic boundaries. Countries specialise in different components within the production value chain. Made in the country X label has become invalid, a  Country has to identify comparative advantage within the production network. “. Thereby elaborating on how Sri Lanka cannot achieve economic growth without joining global production networks through trade. He concluded by commenting on recent developments of import controls by saying that “selective intervention, without disturbing the incentive structure of the country as a policy, is going to be a recipe for disaster”.

These views were expressed at the event “Deep Dive”, organised by the Advocata Institute that aims to bring focus on Sri Lanka’s biggest policy challenges. The event was moderated by  Aneetha Warusavitarana, Research Manager, Advocata Institute.  As a precursor to the event,  Advocata released a primer on debt sustainability with the aim of helping Sri Lankans understand the topic.  The recording of the discussion can be found at Advocata Institute’s YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8M981XmlbAs / to get a comprehensive understanding of Trade and how it affects Sri Lanka’s economy and the livelihoods of all Sri Lankans. The event was organised in partnership with the European Union. 

Excessive Price Controls will worsen Shortages

Originally appeared in the Daily FT , Daily Mirror, Ceylon Today, Sunday Times and Ada Derana Business

New measures treating the symptoms rather than the disease.

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka— Harsh enforcement of price controls may worsen food shortages.

The Commissioner of Essential Services has been granted the power to seize food stocks held by traders and retailers and regulate prices.

There is serious concern with the steep rise in the price of essentials which has taken place over the past two years. Advocata’s Bath Curry Indicator (BCI), which tracks commonly consumed items,  shows a 30% increase in retail food prices in August 2021 compared to August 2020.   

The reasons for the increase in prices include import restrictions and tariffs that have disrupted markets. The classic example is turmeric that retailed at Rs.650 per kg prior to the import ban but now retails at Rs 3500 per kg according to the DCS and at around Rs 4400 to  Rs6900 on online retailers . Other products are similarly affected. 

The recent ban on fertiliser is likely to result in even further increases in the prices of vegetables and cereals over the forthcoming harvests.

These restrictive policies have been compounded by the acute shortage of foreign currency caused by the on-going balance of payments (BOP) crisis. Lack of foreign exchange has imposed additional restrictions on imports resulting in shortages causing prices to spike.

While the increases in prices is a real concern, the causes are complex and are largely due to poor policies. 

The balance of payments crisis arises not due to trade policy but due to the levels of aggregate demand in the economy,  principally through consumption and investment influenced by the prevailing fiscal and monetary policy. The tax cuts towards the end of 2019, fiscal dominance of monetary policy and non-pass through of global commodity prices through price controls and administered prices have contributed towards excess import demand.

This is evident in the trade data: despite the stringent import restrictions imposed after April 2020, import demand for the six months to June 2021 have surged by 30% over the same period in 2020. While exports in the period have also risen, it is the rapid rise in imports that have caused the negative trade balance.

Price controls and administered prices have led to shortages and hoarding.

Instead of addressing the problem at the root, the government is trying to control the symptoms. Previous attempts at price controls have not succeeded as  Advocata’s research in 2018 has shown but better enforcement is not the solution. Instead, the Government should address the policy weaknesses that are the cause of the problem.

Trying to negate policy missteps in fiscal and monetary policy through trade policy in an untenable exercise for it impacts economic efficiency hence growth and productivity and also leads to issues with economic distribution.

Harsh enforcement of price controls could in turn create black markets resulting in significant welfare losses in the form of  a deterioration in product quality, elevate scarcities, disadvantaging the poor who are less sophisticated and in the long run lead to higher prices, lower output due to lower investment.

We urge policy makers to urgently address the root cause of the current crisis by increasing tax revenues via more progressive tax policies - by increasing the tax base for both direct and indirect taxes and reducing the tax gap through greater tax effort. Further, it is best where possible to use well targeted cash transfers to vulnerable segments of the population to improve affordability instead of cutting taxing, imposing price control or using administered prices on utilities.

Key Points 

• Advocata Institute highlights the negative  effects of harsh price controls. 

•  The root causes of the present crisis lies in loose monetary and fiscal policies compounded by import controls and exchange control restrictions. Therefore restoring macroeconomic stability is a priority.

• Cash transfers to vulnerable segments is a better mechanism to implement distributive policies rather than intervening in market prices through tax subsidies, price controls or administered prices.

Media coverage on The Role of Trade in Economic Recovery in Sri Lanka

GSP Plus vital for SL to fight competition – EU Ambassador

After 2010 Sri Lanka’s exports to the European Union (EU) have increased by 60% but half of it is through the Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) plus, stated EU Ambassador to Sri Lanka Denis Chaibi, speaking at a virtual conference organised by Colombo-based think-tank Advocata Institute.

Vietnam increased by 400% and Bangladesh by 150% during the period from 2010 to 2019, thus to stay ahead of competition, GSP plus is significant for Sri Lanka, stated Chaibi. Ambassador further noted that retaining GSP Plus would give a positive image for Sri Lanka that it is committed to human rights obligations. “The EU market is competitive as it is a superpower in terms of product quality standards.

For a Sri Lankan exporter to export to the EU would give the exporter recognition in any other market as the EU only accepts products with certain standards. Sri Lanka is already in a forex crisis. Increasing exports is a way out of the current crises. COVID-19 has created a resilient supply chain but without preferential access it is difficult for Sri Lanka to increase its exports to EU markets.

Read the full article here

SL’s economic recovery led by trade

The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed the real weaknesses Sri Lanka had in terms of its economy for the past four decades.

With the foreign exchange shortage worsening day by day, many fear that the country will go back to the pre-1977 era of ration cards to purchase essential food items, as the importation of such goods will be impossible in the near months.

Sri Lanka needs economic reforms that will decide the fate of the country in the next few decades to come, and many experts say that reforms should start with the country’s protectionism trade that has not really evolved over the years.

Productivity for growth

Speaking at a webinar organised by the Advocata institute, its Chair – Academic Programme Dr. Sarath Rajapathirana said that Sri Lanka has failed to make any substantial reform for the economy, particularly on trade-side reforms, for the last 20 years.

He said trade is very important as it exposes the country to competition and among other areas such as the fiscal side, the budget, and having a proper monetary policy that avoids inflation and contributes to a more stable exchange rate, trade too needs a lot of work.

“Our imports are three times the value of exports, so we have been continuing a trade deficit, which is also accompanied by a current account deficit. These have to be addressed when talking about trade reform; we have to have the macroeconomic support for it,” he said.

He said more than the aggregates of imports and exports, the encouragement to productivity from having open trade or non-restricted trade is more important.

“If you don’t have strong growth in productivity, we have to keep on increasing the factors of production. It is difficult because we need to have more savings and less consumption. So the best way to get it done is to really have a system in which our reforms are going to immediately affect the positive side of our productivity growth,” he noted.

Read the full article here

Increased int’l trade participation key to achieving economic recovery, says top economist

As the national economy continues to face new challenges from multiple angles and their implications are being very much felt by businesses and masses, Dr. Rajapatirana called for the government to start by having in place a more streamlined tariff structure.

“First get rid of para tariffs fast. And then look to introduce a single uniform tariff,” asserted Dr. Rajapatirana while addressing a webinar hosted by the Advocata Institute, this week.

For Sri Lanka to embark on any efforts that would assist in the recovery of the national economy, Dr. Rajapatirana stressed it is essential for the relevant authorities to acknowledge the importance of international trade when charting the path for progress. 

He pointed out that Sri Lanka needs to get away from its protectionist mindset and the way to get about it is to first look at lowering the existing tariff.

“The existing para tariff hurts our competitiveness. This is one of the fundamental things we need to do,” said Dr. Rajapatirana.

He added that the government must also explore the option of introducing a uniform tariff of about 15 percent, which can be reduced over a period of time.

Dr. Rajapatirana opined that by bringing about the suggested changes, Sri Lanka would be signalling to the world that it is serious in wanting to achieve economic progress. 

Dr. Rajapatirana also pointed out that the country has not made any substantial economic reforms, especially on the trade side, in the last 20 years or so.

As the country continues to grapple with the COVID-19 pandemic along with the rest of the world, Dr. Rajapatirana warned that neglecting the economy would only further delay the recovery process. 

“We cannot think of economic recovery without really starting trade reforms. We are in a good driving seat to undertake the reforms since the government has two-thirds majority. 

We need to have the macrocosmic reforms that come from the monetary policy and the fiscal policy. Without that you don’t have the sort of dynamic stability that is needed to put in place a good reform programme,” he said.

Read the full article

Sri Lanka international trade role in Advocata forum as monetary instability drive import controls

Colombo-based think tank Advocata Institute said it is hosting an online forum on ‘The Role of International Trade in Economic Recovery in Sri Lanka’, as the island is mired in the worst import controls since the 1970s after printing money.

Trade controls started during as money was printed to target an ‘output gap’ involving curbs on gold trading and vehicles and other items, escalated into full-scale import substitution, import bans and tightened from 2020.

Sri Lanka’s post-independent economic history is littered with administrations that tried to operate various economic plans without reforming a soft-pegged central bank with activist monetary policy.

Read the full article

NEWS RELEASE: A Deep Dive on Trade “ The Role of International Trade in Economic Recovery in Sri Lanka”

NEWS RELEASE

Originally appeared in the Economy Next, Ada derana Business

The Advocata Institute event on “ The Role of International Trade in Economic Recovery in Sri Lanka”

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka—  The Advocata Institute launches its second episode of the public policy discussion series ‘DeepDive’, which will be on the Topic “The Role of Trade in the Economic Recovery of Sri Lanka”.  

The  discussion  kickstarted with a primer on trade on the topic International Trade: From Theory to Policy: Sri Lanka in Perspective, presented by  Dr. Sarath Rajapatirana,  Chair, Academic Programme of the Advocata Institute. This Primer has already been released in the lead up to the discussion and is available for viewing on the Advocata Institute Youtube page. 

The Deep Dive Discussion will feature an eminent panel consisting of Professor Prema - Chandra Athukorala (Emeritus Professor of Economics, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, ANU), Dr. Sarath Rajapatirana ( Chair, Academic Program of the Advocata Institute), HE Denis Chaibi ( Ambassador, Delegation of the European Union to Sri Lanka and the Maldives), and Dr. Dayaratna Silva ( International Trade Economist, Former Sri Lankan Ambassador to the World Trade Organization) . The Panel would be Moderated by Aneetha Warusavitarana (Research Manager, Advocata Institute) and would be LIVE-streamed on the 30th of August from  4.00 PM onwards.  

The Advocata Institute remains committed to finding policy solutions to key challenges holding back Sri Lanka’s road to development. The lack of a competitive trading regime that can compete internationally,  remains a key structural issue impeding Sri Lanka’s Economy. With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, Sri Lanka’s economic position has become precarious. Exploring opportunities in global trade can be a key strategy to drive the Sri Lankan economy out of the present peril it faces and towards consistent high economic growth and prosperity.   The second episode of Advocata DeepDive would discuss policies and strategies that would enable Sri Lanka to expand and promote trade competitively. The discussion will further explore  how our regional neighbours have used trade as a tool for economic growth. 

The Advocata Institute cordially invites members of the public to tune into the LIVE streamed event on ZOOM and Advocata Institute Facebook Page. Questions will be taken online via ZOOM and Facebook. To get a comprehensive understanding of the benefits of trade debt and how it can affect Sri Lanka’s economy and the livelihoods of all citizens you can watch the Primer on trade titled “ International Trade: From Theory to Policy: Sri Lanka in Perspective ” available on https://youtu.be/NYG_RQxrSqQ

Advocata is an independent policy think tank based in Colombo, Sri Lanka. We conduct research, provide commentary and hold events to promote sound policy ideas compatible with a free society in Sri Lanka. Visit advocata.org for more information.    

IMF or no IMF, Sri Lanka needs Economic Analysis and Plan going forward: Advocata Advisor Dr. Nishan De Mel

Covered by The Island

Whatever Sri Lanka decides about dealing with its debt and paying its way through the world, the country needs to formulate a very good economic analysis and a publicly-backed plan that will establish the credibility of the world in its economy going forward, Dr. Nishan De Mel, Advocata Institute Advisor and Executive Director of Verité Research said recently.

He made this remark at a virtual forum called the Advokatha (Advoකතා) a weekly series conducted by the Advocata Institute on ‘How to Resolve Sri Lanka’s Debt Crisis Without Seeking Assistance from the International Monetary Fund (IMF)’.

The full discussion can be found on Advocata Plus YouTube Channel.

Further speaking he said:

“Such an analysis needs to be thorough and well-structured with the focus on the real economic activity and the financial conditions in the economy. That would be the first step to build credibility of the world about the Sri Lankan economy. It is actually credibility that we lack rather than foreign reserves. If we can build that credibility about us in the countries that we deal with, we may not need assistance from the IMF to resolve our liquidity issue. When such a favourable environment is created and other countries repose their trust in Sri Lanka’s economy, its sovereign credit ratings would see an upgrade and Sri Lanka would be able to raise funds at the international capital market at reasonable interest rates, The skill we need for this is to present an analysis and a plan and then demonstrate our commitment to stick to it. Our concern is whether the government has such a plan and if it does have one, why it is not publicized”.

Read More..

July Food Prices Increase by 0.70%

Originally appeared in the Daily FT and Daily Mirror

Advocata’s Bath Curry Indicator (BCI) which tracks the monthly changes in the price of food recorded a jump of 0.70% for the month of July 2021. 

The month of July experienced an increase in prices compared to the month of June, according to the basket of food tracked by the BCI.

The 3 items that contributed most to this increase were:

For the month of July 2021, the prices of pumpkin showed the largest increase of 66.4%.

Likewise, the prices of Samba rice, Beans, Dhal and fish (balaya) also experienced minor increases in prices as well.

In comparison to the month of July 2020, the BCI has increased by 45% for 2021, which translates that an average family of 4 that spent Rs. 899.85 on this basket of goods for a week in July 2020 would pay Rs. 1308.10 for the same amount of goods in a week in July 2021.

The BCI tracks the weekly retail prices in the Colombo market of the most commonly consumed food ingredients that might be used in a typical Bath curry meal. The prices are collected from the “Weekly Indicators” that the Central Bank publishes.

The BCI Indicator can be accessed at www.bci.advocata.org.

Advocata welcomes full time Minister of Finance for Sri Lanka’s Public Finances

Originally appeared in the Daily FT and Daily Mirror

An independent Minister of Finance can lead the way for better management of Public Finances.

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka— For 23 of the last 30 years, the Head of Government in Sri Lanka has simultaneously held the title of Minister of Finance.  Experience shows that combining the two roles is usually a big mistake as the job of the Head of Government is already very demanding. It is almost impossible for any one person to combine that with being an effective Minister of Finance. The tasks associated with being the Head of Government almost always gain priority.  Secondly, an effective Minister of Finance needs to maintain fiscal discipline by resisting pressures from the political office. The head of government who is also the head of a party or coalition cannot simultaneously meet this requirement due to such conflicting priorities. 

 Analysis of Sri Lanka’s public finances further provides convincing evidence that the absence of a dedicated Minister of Finance has undermined revenue collection. From post independence to around 1990, Sri Lanka’s tax revenue averaged over 20 per cent. At present Sri Lanka has one of the lowest income tax rates compared to peer countries as well as a tax threshold which is several times its GDP (Gross Domestic Product) per capita.

The Advocata Institute, therefore, welcomes the government decision to appoint a dedicated Minister of Finance.

Key Points:

• A dedicated Minister of Finance is beneficial to effective public Finance management.

• The Advocata Institute welcomes the appointment of a full-time Minister of Finance.

• Poor public finance management and poor revenue collection are partly a result of a lack of a dedicated Minister of Finance.

• Understanding the seriousness of the present crisis and utilising pragmatic public policies is the way forward.

[1] The Political Economy of Long-Term Revenue Decline in Sri Lanka, Mick Moore, ICTD Working Paper 65, February 2017

June Food Prices Increase by 14.3 %

Originally appeared in the Daily FT and Daily Mirror

Advocata’s Bath Curry Indicator (BCI) which tracks the monthly changes in the price of food recorded a jump of 14.3%  for the month of  June 2021. 

The month of June experienced an increase in prices comparatively to the month of May, according to the basket of food tracked by the BCI.

The 3 items that contributed most to this increase were:

For the month of June 2021, the prices of green chillies, coconut, and beans, increased by 64%, 33% and 17% respectively. Likewise, the prices of Samba rice, pumpkin, Brinjals, Dhal and red onions also experienced minor increases in prices as well.

 In comparison to the month of June 2020, the BCI has increased by 30%, for 2021, which translates that an average family of 4 that spent Rs.1,136 on this basket of goods for a week in May, would pay Rs.1, 299 for the same amount of goods in a week in June.

 The BCI tracks the weekly retail prices in the Colombo market of the most commonly consumed food ingredients that might be used in a typical Buth curry meal. The prices are collected from the “Weekly Indicators” that the Central Bank publishes.

The BCI Indicator can be accessed at www.bci.advocata.org.

K D Vimanga on Newsline in conversation with Sharlan Benedict 22/06/2021

K D Vimanga, Policy Analyst at Advocata Insitute on News1st NEWSLINE program 22/06/2021. She addresses the policy stability the need of the hour on Newsline with Sharlan Benedict.

"The most important thing we need to realize about public policy is that it deals with peoples issues and the issues that impact their livelihood. And then we analyze those issues. As a policy-maker or policy analyst what we do is try and propose solutions that are equitable, in line with the development and with other factors. The problem in Sri Lanka is that we haven't prioritized this process."

Click here to watch the full video:

Dr. Roshan Perera on Newsline in conversation with Sharlan Benedict 18/06/2021

Dr. Roshan Perera, Senior Visiting Fellow at Advocata Insitute on News1st NEWSLINE program 18/06/2021. She addresses the policy stability the need of the hour on Newsline with Sharlan Benedict.

"The fundamental problem that Sri Lanka is facing, which it has been for decades, is our twin deficit problem. We have both a fiscal and external deficit. Basically, we have been living beyond our means and consuming more than we produce. We must address this problem."

Click here to watch the full video:

Murtaza Jafferjee on Face the Nation: Overcoming Sri Lanka's economic woes

Murtaza Jafferjee Chair of Advocata Institute was featured on the News1st Face the Nation: Overcoming Sri Lanka's economic woes that was aired on the 14th of April 2021.

'It is a pity that we have been playing politics with fuel prices. The first time I recollect a fuel pricing formula was put into operation was back in the early 2000s. In 2005 this program was suspended by the new government. It's by far the single largest component of our import bill. So it's vital that we price it correctly. This price increase was long overdue. Even now we are running at a loss.' - Murtaza Jafferjee

Click here to watch the full video:

Aneetha Warusavitarana on Newsline in conversation with Sharlan Benedict 14/06/2021

Aneetha Warusavitarana (Research Manager at the Advocata Institute) speaks about the fuel pricing mechanisms & economy. SHe addresses this on Newsline with Sharlan Benedict. June 14, 2021.

'Ideally the solution that would work best here is a fuel pricing formula. A crucial factor is that this formula is transparent. The way in which it is calculated should be made available to the public, it should be vetted by the relevant authorities and we should be able to understand how this formula works and how it is linked to international changes in fuel prices.'

Click here to watch the full video: