By Dhananath Fernando
Originally appeared on the Morning
In most of our export strategies, the starting point has been the Government deciding which industries should drive exports – some of these decisions are data-driven.
Accordingly, we examine current export figures and sometimes focus on expanding existing product segments. Secondly, we target additional industries with the expectation that exports can be boosted. While both approaches seem logical at first glance, we need to understand the broader framework of how to grow exports effectively.
Most of the time, we perceive exports as industry-specific, but in reality, exports are about know-how. Know-how becomes a product, and know-how makes a product competitive. However, know-how is not just knowledge – it is sometimes tangible, existing in tools, but more often, it is intangible.
It is akin to Lasith Malinga’s bowling action and his ability to deliver pinpoint yorkers. We can analyse Malinga’s technique, attempt to replicate his action, and even learn from his strategies through interviews or YouTube videos. Yet, even with all this information, it is extremely difficult to replicate his unique skill set.
Malinga possesses tangible components such as his slinging action, run-up, and release style, which can be considered tools. He also has knowledge that he shares through various platforms. However, his true know-how – what makes him exceptional – remains elusive, even to himself.
This difficulty in transferring know-how is likely why the Mumbai Indians recruited Malinga both as a player and later as a coach in the Indian Premier League. If we consider Malinga as a product, he is export-competitive and his value lies in a combination of factors, primarily his unique know-how.
When a country seeks to expand exports, the know-how ecosystem is what determines success or failure. Our apparel manufacturers, for example, possess specialised knowledge that enables them to produce garments at the lowest cost while maintaining high quality.
Initially, their products were relatively simple, but over time, they evolved in complexity. The industry experimented with various approaches – ethical garment production, lean manufacturing, and women’s empowerment – learning from both successes and failures to refine a sustainable model.
Today, Sri Lanka’s apparel exports are not merely about physical products but also the know-how that allows us to compete globally. Know-how thrives within an ecosystem that supports industries.
For this to develop, the Government must provide entrepreneurs and businesses with the freedom to access and test resources – what economists refer to as factor markets. Land, labour, and capital must be available with minimal restrictions on a level playing field.
This is why licensing requirements can be detrimental to exports; they obstruct access to essential resources, thereby stalling know-how development. For instance, if land acquisition is difficult, apparel firms may struggle to operate or innovate. Similarly, excessive labour regulations can increase operational costs, making products uncompetitive and disrupting the know-how ecosystem. Such obstacles discourage exports.
Another common discussion on boosting exports revolves around diversifying the export basket. To understand how diversification occurs, we can refer to Harvard’s Center for International Development, where Prof. Ricardo Hausmann uses the analogy of monkeys and trees in a forest.
In a forest, monkeys do not leap from one end to the other; they move from branch to branch. Similarly, export diversification does not occur in giant leaps but through adjacent product categories. Existing exporters and individuals within the know-how ecosystem expand into related fields.
For instance, if we excel in gemstone exports, an adjacent category would be jewellery. This is why Government intervention in selecting export industries with large targets is often ineffective – diversification and expansion naturally occur within adjacent categories.
In making more complex products for export, Prof. Hausmann employs an economic theory likening diversification to a Scrabble board. If we have only three letters, our word combinations are limited. However, with four letters, the number of possible words increases exponentially.
Therefore, minimising restrictions on factor markets – such as land and labour – enables more access to ‘letters,’ allowing for greater diversification.
Additionally, some ‘letters’ contribute significantly to forming words, like the letter ‘A,’ which is more versatile than a letter like ‘Z’. Similarly, removing barriers to factor markets increases the potential for new export combinations.
In Sri Lanka, our export strategy has traditionally relied on the Government selecting industries for growth. While this approach may work to some extent, if we seek rapid export expansion – like Vietnam – we must focus on the framework rather than forcefully pushing selected industries.
In today’s global economy, no country manufactures all its products on its own. Most nations produce parts, components, and assemblies, relying on international trade to complete final products. If we fail to open our economy to trade, our export ambitions will remain unfulfilled. Trade enhances competitiveness and provides access to multiple ‘letters’ at optimal costs.
Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs) are another crucial element in this equation. FDIs bring in individuals with specialised know-how, much like acquiring a player of Malinga’s calibre. They also introduce advanced technology, enabling the creation of more ‘letters’ and exponentially increasing the potential for new products over time.
If Sri Lanka is serious about exports, we need to focus on the process and the journey. We hope that the upcoming Budget will establish key milestones to guide us in the right direction.
