Originally published in Daily News
By Ravi Ratnsabapathy
Sri Lanka suffers from high construction costs which makes housing unaffordable. A study on domestic migrant workers by Caritas Sri Lanka (2013) showed that for 61% - one of the reasons to migrate was to build a house. Numerous other surveys confirm this finding.
High construction costs also present problems for businesses, particularly tourism where the cost of the building forms a large part of the initial capital outlay. Last week, an article in the Daily News reported that a top executive in a private-sector property company had stated Sri Lanka’s construction cost is at least 30% higher than of Malaysia; a country that it several times wealthier than Sri Lanka.
How can someone on a Sri Lankan salary expect to build a house paying 30% more than someone in Malaysia?
According to a report by Jones Lang LaSalle (2014): “high project development costs coupled with the high borrowing costs for housing loans have breached affordable limits and restricted the home buying prospects for Sri Lanka.
Based on our understanding from the affordability assessment, only the top-income-earning resident Sri Lankans can buy homes in Colombo. Residents with limited income are forced to opt for properties that are at least 20-25 km away from the city limits.”
This is a complex problem and the government controls the price of cement to keep costs under control, but this is obviously not working if construction costs are much lower in other countries.
There are a number of reasons for high costs including supply constraints-shortages of sand and aggregates as well as high cement costs that contribute to high costs of concrete. Then there is the high price of other materials which are high due to protective taxes including steel bars and rods (taxed at 89.66%), ceramic Tiles (taxed at 107.6%), sanitaryware (taxed at 72.4%) as well as aluminium extrusions, granite, electrical fittings and carpets,
Apart from protective taxes, the lack of scale amongst contractors, low labour productivity, outmoded methods and long delays in approvals all contribute to higher overall costs.
The impact of the taxes may be illustrated by comparison to regional prices. For example according to information collated in in September 2016, steel costed around USD 723mt in Sri Lanka but costs only USD500mt in Thailand and USD 470mt in China.
What is surprising is that even cement is higher than the region, despite the price control. How can this be? The problem is in the way the government goes about setting price controls, the Consumer Affairs Authority applies a narrow range of controlled prices on cement which vary by product and manufacturer. The prices are determined based on cost estimates for each product provided by each manufacturer.
Usually if a controlled price is set too low it results in shortages but there are no visible large scale shortages, although these are not unknown, being witnessed in 2011 and 2014. Temporary shortages of cement occur from time to time due to hoarding when traders hoard stocks, in anticipation of price revisions.
It is likely that involvement of the industry in the price setting process means that they set at a level comfortable to the industry. With set prices there is no competition among producers on price, so normal competitive forces do not function either.
Quality
Why not solve the problem of high priced local cement by simply importing cheaper cement, if it is available elsewhere? The local cement industry claims this will lead to low quality (and low cost) cement imports, something that has been experienced in the past. Cheap cement is available overseas but the possibility of substandard cement or construction work is of serious concern since the consequences will manifest long after construction is completed and carry grave consequences.
Cheap imports of cement would benefit consumers but how should quality be ensured?
The problem is that Sri Lanka lacks a comprehensive building code; essential for consumer protection and public safety. Although old regulations such as the Factories Ordinance exist these are not up to date and enforcement is weak. A Standard Code of Practice to regulate and enforce design, construction and compliance requirements is necessary.
While a uniform code is absent, a multiplicity of approvals exist: at provincial, district, Pradesheeya Sabaha, urban and municipal level. These become even more complex when central agencies such as Urban Development Authority (UDA), Sri Lanka Land Reclamation and Development Corporation and Department of Agrarian Development. This leads to overlaps of authority, conflicts of instructions, contradictory regulations and compliance loopholes.
There is a lot of red-tape but it does not improve safety.
A proper code, legally enforceable, covering all classes of buildings and including safety, structural stability and accessibility is needed. The code should be enforced by holding the building contractors and architects responsible for any failures and carry criminal and civil penalties.
Along with a code, building contractors and architects should be licensed and carry professional indemnity insurance. The objective of licensing is to ensure that work is done by people who are conversant with the standard (which should carry statutory force) and conduct their duties competently and professionally.
In the event of any failure in buildings they may lose their license to practice. This is apart from any action taken in the courts. The insurance ensures that consumers can receive compensation for shoddy work.
Specialist licenses should be necessary for more complex work including:
(a) Piling works
(b) Ground support and stabilization works
(c) Site investigation work
(d) Structural steelwork
(e) Pre-cast concrete work
(f) In-situ post-tensioning work
Underinvestment
Sri Lanka has abundant limestone deposits in the North but even ten years after the end of the conflict the cement plant in the area remains closed
Underinvestment in the sector may be attributed to a combination of the uncertainty surrounding prices and protectionism. Investment decisions are long-term and price controls; despite industry influence in setting them, does add a new level of uncertainty over future profits, deterring investment. This is particularly so in the cement industry because the start-up costs are high and the gestation period for a plant is long.
In 2013 the Government imposed a restriction on the number of cement plants that may be operated in a port limiting it to one per port. If a new factory is to be set up, priority has to be given to existing operators in the port, effectively limiting competition.
Overall construction costs
Despite price controls being imposed on cement, Sri Lanka has high costs of construction. There is no coherence in policy with different objectives are being pursued in isolation, unlike for example in the UK where the Government in partnership with industry has developed a strategy to improve the performance of the construction sector by 2025. Objectives include lowering costs: a 33% reduction in the initial construction of new build and the whole-life costs of built assets, a 50% reduction in the overall time, from inception to completion of construction and a 50% reduction in greenhouse gases.
Overall, intervention in the construction market has resulted in raising, rather than lowering construction costs.
Further, by failing to understand the proper role of the state and intervening unnecessarily in setting prices it has neglected its core responsibility – regulation to protect consumers. Although in most circumstances the best protection is the common sense of an individual consumer, in instances where technical knowledge is needed to detect poor quality there is a case for regulation, particularly if public safety is involved.
The lack of a building code is a serious failure on the part of the state.
To protect consumers the Government should stop regulating the price of cement and focus on drawing up and enforcing a proper building code.
To lower costs the tax structure on construction materials must rationalised and competition facilitated.