By Dhananath Fernando
Originally appeared on the Morning
A 100-year journey or a 40-year leap?
For many Sri Lankans, one of the most common points of comparison is Singapore. We have heard time and again how Singapore once lagged behind Sri Lanka in terms of GDP per capita but eventually surpassed not only Sri Lanka but also many other developing nations worldwide.
Given that both countries are in Asia and that Singapore once looked to Sri Lanka as an aspirational model, it is natural for Sri Lankans to frequently draw comparisons between the two.
Recently, at the Advocata Institute’s ‘Ignite Growth Conference,’ Central Bank of Sri Lanka Assistant Governor Dr. Chandranath Amarasekara presented a slide illustrating how long it would actually take for Sri Lanka to reach Singapore’s current GDP per capita under different growth scenarios.
Dr. Amarasekara projected the timeframe based on Sri Lanka’s GDP per capita growth at 3%, 5%, 6%, and 8% annually. For context, GDP per capita is a commonly used measure to gauge a country’s economic prosperity. Currently, Sri Lanka’s GDP per capita stands at approximately $ 3,800, while Singapore’s is around $ 84,000.
The calculation estimates the number of years it would take for Sri Lanka’s GDP per capita to grow from $ 3,800 to $ 84,000, assuming compound annual growth at different rates:
3% growth rate: 105 years
5% growth rate: 64 years
6% growth rate: 54 years
8% growth rate: 41 years
The challenge of comparing Singapore and SL
In my view, comparing Singapore and Sri Lanka directly is difficult because the two nations offer entirely different value propositions. Singapore is essentially a city state with a population of six million, whereas Sri Lanka is over 3.5 times larger in terms of population.
The demographics, political landscapes, and economic structures are vastly different. However, from an economic perspective, an average Singaporean is 21 times wealthier than an average Sri Lankan.
To put it in simple terms:
Singapore, with just six million people, generates an economic output of $ 500 billion
Sri Lanka, with 21 million people, produces less than $ 90 billion
Learning from Singapore without copying
While it may not be meaningful to copy Singapore’s model outright due to fundamental differences in culture and circumstances, there are key economic principles Sri Lanka can adopt.
A rock-solid monetary framework
One of Singapore’s greatest strengths is its monetary stability. The country’s financial system remains robust thanks to sound economic policies developed under visionary leaders like Goh Keng Swee.
A stable currency is crucial because wealth is stored in the form of money. For example, if a farmer produces 100 kg of rice and sells it for Rs. 20,000, depositing that money in a bank means converting his labour into a universally accepted currency. If inflation erodes the value of that currency over time, it discourages productivity. A monetary system that fails to preserve value will ultimately undermine economic progress.
Many admire Singapore’s modern infrastructure, but what they often overlook is the country’s strong monetary foundation. Interestingly, the same Dr. Goh who helped shape Singapore’s economy also advised Sri Lanka, but his recommendations were never fully implemented.
The right policy framework
While reaching Singapore’s current economic level may seem like a monumental task, the key lies in laying the right policy framework. If the right economic policies are put in place, progress will follow naturally. It is not about chasing Singapore’s end results but rather about focusing on the right processes to achieve sustainable growth.
Instead of fixating on when Sri Lanka will become like Singapore, we should prioritise fundamental economic reforms in areas like trade, investment, and labour policies. If we get these right, the rest will take care of itself.
(Source: ‘Ignite Growth Conference’ presentation by Dr. Chandranath Amarasekara)